Connect market regime, sector strength, business evidence, price structure, liquidity, events and holding-period risk for Indian equities.
Framework • Evidence • Risk • Review
Equity decisions need a clock. Intraday research uses session evidence, swing research adds multi-session structure and event risk, while investment-oriented work requires deeper business and valuation analysis. This pillar keeps those horizons distinct while showing where their evidence can support one another.
Broad-market regime and sector leadership provide context before a stock-specific setup is evaluated. Relative strength is more informative when liquidity and a clear comparison benchmark are also considered.
An intraday view may prioritise the opening, catalyst and session structure. A swing thesis must account for overnight gaps and scheduled events, while an investment view needs financial and valuation evidence.
A sound company can still be priced aggressively or show weak market structure. Fundamental evidence and technical behaviour answer different questions and should be weighted according to the decision.
Stops may execute poorly through overnight gaps or thin order books. Quantity should reflect both the planned price risk and the possibility of a worse realised exit.